Abstract
Objectives Current perspectives concerning clinical decision making favour inclusion of patient preference for therapy. This exploratory study aimed to forge introductory insights into patient preference for outpatient-based rehabilitation after total knee replacement (TKR). Methods TKR recipients from six public hospitals participating in a prospective, longitudinal study assessing outcomes after surgery were surveyed 1 year after surgery about preferences for rehabilitation. Surveys were conducted face-to-face or via postal questionnaire. Questions included global satisfaction (percentage scale) with therapy received, future preference for therapy and the reasons underpinning preference. Results Ninety-three (93/115) TKR recipients participated [mean age 68 (SD 8) years; 66% female; 75% face-to-face interview]. Group-based (39/93) and one-to-one therapies (38/93) were the most common modes experienced. Most participants (81/93) were highly satisfied (satisfaction ≥ 75%). Future preference was associated with satisfaction with past exposure regardless of mode (P = 0.02), hence no overall preference for one mode emerged. Commonality existed in the reasons why patients preferred specific modes. The most common reason for preferring group-based therapy was psychosocial benefit whilst the more personalized approach was the most common reason for preferring one-to-one therapy. Conclusions Patient global satisfaction is similarly high across different modes of outpatient rehabilitation despite differences in perceived benefits. The association between satisfaction and preference potentially indicates that provided the service is deemed high quality, the actual mode of therapy offered is less important to this patient population. Research is required, however, to establish the relationship between preference and outcome, the stability of preference across time, and the effect of multiple rehabilitation exposures on preference. For now, the quality of current uni-modal programmes could be enhanced by incorporation of features typically associated with alternative modes.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 586-592 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice |
Volume | 18 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2012 |
Externally published | Yes |
Access to Document
Other files and links
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement: Implications for practice and future research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
View full fingerprint
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
Naylor, J. M., Mittal, R., Carroll, K., & Harris, I. A. (2012). Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement: Implications for practice and future research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 18(3), 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01619.x
Naylor, Justine M. ; Mittal, Rajat ; Carroll, Katherine et al. / Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement : Implications for practice and future research. In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2012 ; Vol. 18, No. 3. pp. 586-592.
@article{c8245e1d39594e74b88afa3c9c82e2e4,
title = "Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement: Implications for practice and future research",
abstract = "Objectives Current perspectives concerning clinical decision making favour inclusion of patient preference for therapy. This exploratory study aimed to forge introductory insights into patient preference for outpatient-based rehabilitation after total knee replacement (TKR). Methods TKR recipients from six public hospitals participating in a prospective, longitudinal study assessing outcomes after surgery were surveyed 1 year after surgery about preferences for rehabilitation. Surveys were conducted face-to-face or via postal questionnaire. Questions included global satisfaction (percentage scale) with therapy received, future preference for therapy and the reasons underpinning preference. Results Ninety-three (93/115) TKR recipients participated [mean age 68 (SD 8) years; 66% female; 75% face-to-face interview]. Group-based (39/93) and one-to-one therapies (38/93) were the most common modes experienced. Most participants (81/93) were highly satisfied (satisfaction ≥ 75%). Future preference was associated with satisfaction with past exposure regardless of mode (P = 0.02), hence no overall preference for one mode emerged. Commonality existed in the reasons why patients preferred specific modes. The most common reason for preferring group-based therapy was psychosocial benefit whilst the more personalized approach was the most common reason for preferring one-to-one therapy. Conclusions Patient global satisfaction is similarly high across different modes of outpatient rehabilitation despite differences in perceived benefits. The association between satisfaction and preference potentially indicates that provided the service is deemed high quality, the actual mode of therapy offered is less important to this patient population. Research is required, however, to establish the relationship between preference and outcome, the stability of preference across time, and the effect of multiple rehabilitation exposures on preference. For now, the quality of current uni-modal programmes could be enhanced by incorporation of features typically associated with alternative modes.",
keywords = "arthroplasty, knee, patient preference, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, total knee replacement",
author = "Naylor, {Justine M.} and Rajat Mittal and Katherine Carroll and Harris, {Ian A.}",
year = "2012",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01619.x",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "586--592",
journal = "Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice",
issn = "1356-1294",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",
}
Naylor, JM, Mittal, R, Carroll, K & Harris, IA 2012, 'Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement: Implications for practice and future research', Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 586-592. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01619.x
Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement: Implications for practice and future research. / Naylor, Justine M.; Mittal, Rajat; Carroll, Katherine et al.
In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, Vol. 18, No. 3, 06.2012, p. 586-592.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement
T2 - Implications for practice and future research
AU - Naylor, Justine M.
AU - Mittal, Rajat
AU - Carroll, Katherine
AU - Harris, Ian A.
PY - 2012/6
Y1 - 2012/6
N2 - Objectives Current perspectives concerning clinical decision making favour inclusion of patient preference for therapy. This exploratory study aimed to forge introductory insights into patient preference for outpatient-based rehabilitation after total knee replacement (TKR). Methods TKR recipients from six public hospitals participating in a prospective, longitudinal study assessing outcomes after surgery were surveyed 1 year after surgery about preferences for rehabilitation. Surveys were conducted face-to-face or via postal questionnaire. Questions included global satisfaction (percentage scale) with therapy received, future preference for therapy and the reasons underpinning preference. Results Ninety-three (93/115) TKR recipients participated [mean age 68 (SD 8) years; 66% female; 75% face-to-face interview]. Group-based (39/93) and one-to-one therapies (38/93) were the most common modes experienced. Most participants (81/93) were highly satisfied (satisfaction ≥ 75%). Future preference was associated with satisfaction with past exposure regardless of mode (P = 0.02), hence no overall preference for one mode emerged. Commonality existed in the reasons why patients preferred specific modes. The most common reason for preferring group-based therapy was psychosocial benefit whilst the more personalized approach was the most common reason for preferring one-to-one therapy. Conclusions Patient global satisfaction is similarly high across different modes of outpatient rehabilitation despite differences in perceived benefits. The association between satisfaction and preference potentially indicates that provided the service is deemed high quality, the actual mode of therapy offered is less important to this patient population. Research is required, however, to establish the relationship between preference and outcome, the stability of preference across time, and the effect of multiple rehabilitation exposures on preference. For now, the quality of current uni-modal programmes could be enhanced by incorporation of features typically associated with alternative modes.
AB - Objectives Current perspectives concerning clinical decision making favour inclusion of patient preference for therapy. This exploratory study aimed to forge introductory insights into patient preference for outpatient-based rehabilitation after total knee replacement (TKR). Methods TKR recipients from six public hospitals participating in a prospective, longitudinal study assessing outcomes after surgery were surveyed 1 year after surgery about preferences for rehabilitation. Surveys were conducted face-to-face or via postal questionnaire. Questions included global satisfaction (percentage scale) with therapy received, future preference for therapy and the reasons underpinning preference. Results Ninety-three (93/115) TKR recipients participated [mean age 68 (SD 8) years; 66% female; 75% face-to-face interview]. Group-based (39/93) and one-to-one therapies (38/93) were the most common modes experienced. Most participants (81/93) were highly satisfied (satisfaction ≥ 75%). Future preference was associated with satisfaction with past exposure regardless of mode (P = 0.02), hence no overall preference for one mode emerged. Commonality existed in the reasons why patients preferred specific modes. The most common reason for preferring group-based therapy was psychosocial benefit whilst the more personalized approach was the most common reason for preferring one-to-one therapy. Conclusions Patient global satisfaction is similarly high across different modes of outpatient rehabilitation despite differences in perceived benefits. The association between satisfaction and preference potentially indicates that provided the service is deemed high quality, the actual mode of therapy offered is less important to this patient population. Research is required, however, to establish the relationship between preference and outcome, the stability of preference across time, and the effect of multiple rehabilitation exposures on preference. For now, the quality of current uni-modal programmes could be enhanced by incorporation of features typically associated with alternative modes.
KW - arthroplasty
KW - knee
KW - patient preference
KW - physiotherapy
KW - rehabilitation
KW - total knee replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860864814&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01619.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01619.x
M3 - Review article
SN - 1356-1294
VL - 18
SP - 586
EP - 592
JO - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
JF - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice
IS - 3
ER -
Naylor JM, Mittal R, Carroll K, Harris IA. Introductory insights into patient preferences for outpatient rehabilitation after knee replacement: Implications for practice and future research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2012 Jun;18(3):586-592. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01619.x